![raskin video raskin video](https://lezwatchtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Gaby-Dunn.jpg)
So, it’s ok for Dem Jamie Raskin to try to ‘overturn’ Trump electors but it’s incitement to violence when Trump urged Congress to “overturn” Biden electors? Isn’t that called hypocrisy? Rand Paul (R-KY) suggested it was “hubris” to select a Democrat who had objected to certifying one election to lead an impeachment over objections to certifying another: Lead impeachment manager Jamie Raskin objected to Florida's electoral votes in 2017. Biden, then Vice President and as such President of the Senate, rejected Raskin’s objection as out of order. In January 2017, however, Raskin himself objected to the certification of Florida’s electoral votes on the claim that ten of the state’s electors were supposedly not legally qualified to serve as electors under state law. Trump’s continued insistence that he was the true “landslide” winner, Raskin said, is “the big lie that was responsible for inflaming and inciting the mob in the first place.” Joe Neguse (D-CO) argued that Trump was responsible for the January 6 riot at the Capitol building not only via the words of his speech that day, but because he spent months pursuing allegations of election fraud in several states “widespread” enough to flip the outcome to now-President Joe Biden. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) calls former President Donald Trump the “inciter-in-chief” for protesting the certification of the 2020 election, critics have called attention to Raskin’s own past refusal to accept the outcome of the 2016 election.ĭuring the second day of the Senate impeachment trial, Raskin and fellow impeachment manager Rep. WASHINGTON, D.C., Febru( LifeSiteNews) – As lead impeachment manager Rep.
![raskin video raskin video](http://images.dailykos.com/images/333999/story_image/AP_423421477203.jpg)
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark to continue getting our news.